Leicester Tigers' relationship with the Rugby Football Union (RFU) has been dealt a massive blow because of events surrounding director of rugby Richard Cockerill's nine-game ban for "inappropriate behaviour".
Monday night's hearing saw Cockerill's nine-game ban remain, but an amendment to the details means that two of those games will be the pre-season fixtures against Ulster and Jersey.
Cockerill may now resume match-day contact and coaching duties on October 18, after the Heineken Cup game against Treviso.
While that may have been seen as a small victory for Leicester, the club are still clearly furious with the way that the way the RFU have conducted themselves during the case.
In a statement released yesterday, the club said it was pleased with the judgement which it believed "vindicated their decision to appeal".
But it added: "We await with interest the written judgement to see why the pre-season game against Montpellier falls into a different category than those against Jersey and Ulster.
"We remain disappointed with the RFU's conduct in this matter but, as we have previously stated, this is a matter we shall pursue privately."
While Tigers may well be keeping tight-lipped in public, I understand that privately they are furious with elements of the RFU's case against them.
It was reported that one of the country's leading sports law barristers, Richard Smith, who sometimes also works for the RFU with the England team, was instructed by Leicester to represent them at the hearing.
But he was not the man who eventually turned up to put Cockerill's case forward – that being Ray Tully.
The ins and outs of how that happened could be one of the reasons why Tigers are so angry.
It is already public knowledge that Tigers were also unhappy that Cockerill's previous conduct-related run-in with the RFU was discussed before a guilty verdict was reached – conduct that was criticised by the panel at the time.
The explosion of bad feeling from the club towards the game's governing body follows a long spell of peace between the club and country.
The blow-up comes less than a year after the RFU appointed Gerard McEvilly as their new head of discipline.
McEvilly began his post last September and took over from Bruce Reece-Russel, who spent 13 years in the role.
Just three months into his new role, McEvily sent Cockerill a warning letter because of comments made in a television interview regarding the refereeing in a game against Gloucester.
Leicester dismissed the warning out of sight as unnecessary.
Tigers then made a veiled criticism of the RFU's disciplinary procedures after Cockerill was handed his nine-match ban in a statement which read: "There are elements of the way in which they have conducted this case which, in our opinion, calls into question the new disciplinary structure." It is likely that McEvily's latest spat with the club has some legs left in it yet.