The fox hunting community is calling for the repeal of the Hunting Act on its tenth anniversary.
Today in 2004 the legislation was granted Royal Assent in Parliament although it did not become law until February 2005.
Many hunt supporters felt it would wreck the rural economy.
But that has not happened and anti-hunting groups are calling for the law to be toughened.
Traditional Christmas and New Year fox hunting meets still draw thousands of spectators in Leicestershire and neighbouring counties.
Three years ago the Harborough Fernie Hunt was one of the few organisations nationwide to be prosecuted under the law.
Huntsman Derek Hopkins and terrierman Kevin Allen, were found guilty of hunting a live fox and digging into an active badger sett which was confirmed on appeal and they were fined and ordered to pay costs.
Chris Parker, joint master of the Fernie Hunt, said the Hunting Act should be repealed.
He said: "As for its impact on the equestrian scene, there have been some changes. But I would say the sector is stronger nowadays and we are having more people attending meets."
Mr Parker said that the hunting community and many rural people were still sore at the imposition of the act.
He said: "It is a political act which is open to interpretation which makes it very difficult for hunt employees to know if they are complying with it or not.
"Hounds cannot differentiate between different animals to see if they are complying with the law either."
He said chasing a rabbit was legal as they were classed as vermin whereas foxes are not.
He added he hoped a future Conservative government would repeal the act.
Tim Bonner, director of campaigns at the Countryside Alliance who supported the Fernie Hunt in court, said: "For hunting, and many others in the countryside, November 2004 was a very low moment, but despite all the fears and the dire predictions hunting still thrives.
"Many honestly thought that the hunts would disband, and hunting people would take up some 'acceptable' activity like golf.
"Ten years on, practically every hunt that was operating when the ban was passed is still going strong."
Mr Bonner added: "Hunts can, and do, continue to provide an opportunity for people to see hounds work, and in the case of mounted packs, ride across country. They are, however, now limited in how they can contribute towards fox control.
"Ironically the Hunting Act provides absolutely no protection for foxes. It still remains perfectly legal to shoot or trap a fox, and in some cases to use dogs in the process."
He said hunts continued to offer a legal fox control service to farmers whose land they are invited onto using terriers or two hounds to flush and shoot foxes, but they cannot use a full pack.
League Against Cruel Sports brought the prosecution against the Fernie and chief executive Joe Duckworth said: "The Hunting Act has proven to be an effective and popular piece of legislation, with a higher number of convictions than similar wildlife laws."
He added: "The problem is not with the law. It's with those that flout it. It is time to build on the successes of first 10 years and strengthen the Hunting Act to ensure the spirit of the Act is fulfilled."
The League wants three main improvements: prohibiting the use of dogs below ground, inserting a 'reckless' provision to ensure the killing of wild mammals during a trail hunt cannot be passed off as an 'unfortunate accident' and increasing the punishments available to the courts so that the Act is brought in line with other animal protection legislation.
Alan Kirby, of Protect our Wild Animals, said: "In 10 years, just 33 persons from organised hunts have been convicted of illegal hunting, their sanctions averaging less than £500 fines each.
"Clearly the Act provides no real deterrent, clearly it needs to be strengthened to give proper effect to the will of Parliament and people - 80 per cent of whom, urban and rural now support the ban on hunting wild mammals with dogs for 'sport' it was supposed to have brought about."